CLEAR SCOPE. TRACEABLE REVIEW.
Research image review & practice
Discuss image provenance, editing records and submission checks. Automated detection is an exploration area.
What can a research image check establish?
File specifications, source records and image-content judgments are different tasks. We first discuss the criteria, available materials and human review before confirming whether a project can be supported. Tool flags do not establish misconduct.
Groups defining a pre-submission image review workflow or exploring an image review tool project.
Identify the image types, source material and review criteria first. Separate format checks, editing records and expert judgments; an automated flag is not a conclusion.
What we can deliver together
- A discussion of review needs and workflow
- A checklist of checks and supporting evidence
- A project scope agreed after feasibility review
What to prepare
- Image types and submission requirements
- Available provenance and editing records
- Review responsibilities and data handling limits
How we evaluate completion
This page supports discovery conversations. Checks, reports, human review and limitations require feasibility assessment; there is no production automated detection product offered here.
Scope of collaboration
Algorithmic flags do not establish misconduct. We do not promise exhaustive detection or submission compliance. This website does not accept research image uploads.
How collaboration works
- 01Define review needs
- 02Identify criteria and evidence
- 03Assess feasibility
- 04Agree project and human review
Common questions
Can I upload images for a scan?
Online scanning and uploads are not available. Start by discussing the image types and workflow you need.
Does a flag establish an integrity violation?
No. Original material and qualified human review are essential; a tool flag cannot by itself establish misconduct.
Further reading
GOOD QUESTIONS START GOOD PROJECTS
Bring a question.
Let’s work on it.
A model, a repetitive workflow, or research that deserves a clearer story. Start there.
Let’s talk research